=========================================
	!! VALIDATION PLOTS FOR QFL, MOSTLY PIONS. !!
	  =========================================
			
			Assembled by Steve Behrends (FNALD::SOB, Brandeis U),
			  11 April 1997.


  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |    Plots from the Test Beam:						  |
 |    ========================					  	  |
 |    Unless noted, (1) TB is 1990, (2) response is for pions, (3) target |
 |    tower is T3.							  |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

  FILE			DESCRIPTION				PROVENANCE
  ----          	-----------   		        	----------
 
 TB_57_PI_2X2.TOP	Response at 57.1 GeV (1987 TB)		CDF-1066 Fig.9
			All pi's; CEM Mips; component breakdown.

 TB_57_PI_MIP_PEAK.TOP	CEM E near MIP peak, 57.1 GeV (1987 TB)	CDF-1066 Fig.11

 TB_10_PI.TOP		Response at 9.59 GeV			CDF-1344 Fig.1

 TB_7_PI.TOP		Response at 7.12 GeV			CDF-1344 Fig.2
 
 TB_50_PI_ALL_AND_MIPS.TOP Response at 50.26 GeV,		CDF-1286 Fig.2
			All pi's, and CEM Mips		
 
 TB_150_PI.TOP 		Response at 151.1 GeV			CDF-1286 Fig.19

 TB_227_PI.TOP 		Response at 220.1 GeV			SOB

 xxx      		Pions in phi crack, <E> vs phi		CDF-1361 Fig.12

 TB_50_PI_IN_CRACK.TOP 	Pions in phi crack, E			CDF-1361 Fig.10

 xxx			Electrons in phi crack, <E> vs phi	CDF-1361 Fig.5

 TB_50_E_IN_CRACK.TOP	Electrons in phi crack, E		CDF-1361 Fig.6


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 |   Plots from Run0 single particle analysis:				|
 |   ========================================				|
 |   Unless noted, (1) particle response is integrated over Central	|
 |   eta, towers 0:8; (2) response has been corrected for pi0		|
 |   background; (3) response is defined as a 3x3 sum of towers in both	|
 |   the CEM and CHA.							|
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

 CDF_PI_E_VS_P.TOP	E/P vs. P, TB and MBIAS,		SOB
			integrated over tower face

 MBIAS_CHA_VS_P.TOP 	E_CHA/P vs. P				CDF-1066 Fig.7b

 MBIAS_ZEROS_VS_P.TOP 	"Zero's" vs. P				CDF-1066 Fig.3

 MBIAS_ZEROS_VS_ETA.TOP "Zero's" vs. eta,			CDF-1066 Fig.4
			integrated over P.

 MBIAS_VS_TOWER_PHI.TOP	Response vs. tower phi, 		CDF-1344 Fig.11
			integrated over P (?), no correction
			for pi0 background.

 MBIAS_E_VS_P_INNER.TOP E/P vs. P, inner 0.6x0.6 of tower	CDF-1344 Fig.13