We summarize here the blessed results for the measurement of the ratio of branching fractions:
Figure 1: Invariant mass of D+ pi-. The D+ is reconstruted from the decay D+ --> K- pi+ pi+. The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. Backgrounds from B-meson decays are shown in pink(B0 --> D+ rho-/ D*+ pi-) and green (B0-->D+ X).(EPS) |
Figure 2: Invariant mass of K- pi+ pi+. The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. The dashed line indicates backgrounds from D_s decays where the particles from the D_s were reconstructed as K- pi+ pi+. All events in the distribution contain a muon which has an impact parameter, with respect to the beam line, larger than 120 microns. (EPS) |
Figure 3: Invariant mass of D*+ pi-. The D*+ is reconstruted from the decay D*+ --> D0 pi+, D0 --> K- pi+. The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. Backgrounds from B-meson decays are shown in black(B0 --> D*+ K-), pink(B0 --> D*+ rho-) green(B0-->D*+ X).(EPS) |
Figure 4: Invariant mass difference (M(D0 pi+) - M(D0)). The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. All events in the distribution contain a muon which has an impactd parameter, with respect to the beam line, larger than 120 microns. (EPS) |
Figure 5: Invariant mass of Lambda_c+ pi-. The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. Backgrounds from other B-hadron decays are shown in pink(Lambda_b-->Lambda_c+ K-), tan(4-prong B-meson decays), green(multi-body meson decay) and black(multi-body Lambda_b decays). (EPS) |
Figure 6: Invariant mass of p K- pi+. The red curve is the result of a fit to a signal and background model. All events in the distribution contain a muon which has an impactd parameter, with respect to the beam line, larger than 120 microns. (EPS) |
Figure 7: Transverse momentum (Pt) of the reconstructed B0 from B0-->D+ pi- decays. The squares are data and the triangles are from a Monte Carlo (MC). Good agreement between the data and MC is needed to determine the correct acceptance for the semileptonic decays. (EPS) |
Figure 8: Transverse momentum (Pt) of the reconstructed Lambda_b from Lambda_b --> Lambda_c+ pi- decays. The squares are data and the triangles are from a Monte Carlo (MC). Good agreement between the data and MC is needed to determine the correct acceptance for the semileptonic decays. (EPS) |
Figure 9: Invariant mass of the D+ mu-. The squares are data and the triangles are from a Monte Carlo (MC) which includes both the semileptonic signal and associated backgrounds. semileptonic decays. (EPS) |
Figure 10: Invariant mass of D*+ mu-. The squares are data and the triangles are from a Monte Carlo (MC) which includes both the semileptonic signal and associated backgrounds. (EPS) |
Figure 11: Invariant mass of Lambda_c+ mu-. The squares are data and the triangles are from a Monte Carlo (MC) which includes both the semileptonic signal and associated backgrounds. (EPS) |
Figure 12: Ratio of branching fractions for B0--> D+ modes for various subsets of the data. The band represents the result from the full data sample. All uncertainties are statistical only. (EPS) |
Figure 13: Ratio of branching fractions for B0--> D*+ modes for various subsets of the data. The band represents the result from the full data sample. All uncertainties are statistical only. (EPS) |
Figure14: Ratio of branching fractions for Lambda_b--> Lambda_c+ modes for various subsets of the data. The band represents the result from the full data sample. All uncertainties are statistical only. (EPS) |