![]() |
Search for the Wh Production Using High-pT Isolated Like-Sign Dilepton Events in Run-II | |
| CDF Collaboration | ||
| Contents |
| 1. Abstract |
| 2. Baseline Event Selection |
| 3. Background Estimation |
Backgrounds containing prompt real leptons (physics backgrounds) are
estimated using Monte Calro Samples.
The backgrounds can be classified into reducible and irreducible backgrounds
|
|
Residual photon-conversion events are one of the dominant backgrounds
for the like-sign dilepton analysis. They arise from
an electron originating from the photon conversion with an unobserved partner
track with low momentum.
We estimate the amount of this background by multiplying lepton + conversion
events by the residual photon-conversion rate which is defined by |
|
| gif, eps | |
| Residual photon-conversion rate as a function of photon pT. |
| Fake lepton events are also a dominant background for the like-sign dilepton analysis. The fake electron backgrounds result from π±, overlap of π0 + track and residual photon-conversions. The fake muon backgrounds result from hadrons that punch-through the calorimeter, and π± and K± which decay in flight to muons. We also consider leptons from semileptonic decays of heavy-flavor hadrons as one of fake lepton backgrounds. We estimate the backgrounds by multiplying lepton + isolated track events by the fake-lepton rate derived from inclusive jet samples. The fake-lepton rate (Rfake) is defined as the rate of fake leptons relative to isolated tracks. We subtract the residual photon-conversion component from the fake electron rate, because we estimate the amount of residual photon-conversion events separately. |
|
| gif, eps | |
| Fake-lepton rate as a function of isolated track pT. |
|
| gif |
| ee | eμ | μe | μμ | |
| pT1 | |
|
|
|
| gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps | |
| pT2 | |
|
|
|
| gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps | |
| pT12 | |
|
|
|
| gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps |
| 4. Final Selection |
We examine the baseline like-sign dilepton events on
the 2 dimensional plane of the 2nd
lepton pT (pT2) versus
the dilepton system pT (pT12).
By scanning this 2D plane of
pT2 and pT12,
we find no significant discrepancies between the data and the background
expectations for all the cut values.
We then determine the optimized selection criteria for signal events as
pT2 ≥
20 GeV/c and pT12 ≥ 15 GeV/c
by
minimizing the expected upper limit on the cross section times branching fraction.
Using these selection criteria, we define 4 regions and background predictions and observed data for each region:
|
<
|
| gif, eps | |
| Expected upper limit on the σ(ppbar→Wh)×Br(h →W+W-) at the 95% confidence level. |
|
| gif |
| 5. Efficiency of Signal and Systematic Uncertainties |
| Efficiencies for higgs events shown for
each higgs mass. The uncertainties shown here include Monte Carlo statistics and those associated with Monte Carlo scale factors. |
Systematic Uncertainties on the signal efficiency. |
|
|
| gif | gif |
| 6. Cross Section Limit |
| Cross section upper limit at the 95% confidence level | Ratio of the limit to the Standard Model prediction. | Ratio of the limit to the fermiophobic higgs production. |
|
|
|
| gif | gif | gif |
| Cross section upper limit at the 95% confidence level | Ratio of the limit to the Standard Model prediction. | Ratio of the limit to the prediction for the fermiophobic higgs production. |
|
|
|
| gif, eps | gif, eps | gif, eps |
| 7. Conclusion |