DPE and Exclusive Dijet Productions
in Run II
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We present
results from studies of dijet events produced in Double Pomeron
Exchange (DPE) in Run II. The events are selected from a sample of
about 310
pb-1 of data collected with a dedicated diffractive trigger. We first
measure cross sections of DPE dijet events for different minimum ET of
the second leading jet. Then, we perform a search for events from
exclusive dijet production pbar + p ---> pbar + Jet + Jet + p in the
DPE dijet sample using a kinematic variable called dijet mass fraction,
Rjj, defined as a dijet mass divided by the DPE system mass. The search
is based on comparing the Rjj distribution shapes between the data and
inclusive DPE dijet Monte Carlo predictions. We observe, for the first
time, exclusively produced dijet events as a significant excess of data
at high Rjj range. The cross sections of observed exclusive dijet
events are measured using combinations of inclusive DPE and exclusive
dijet Monte Carlo simulations. All blessed plots are combined in a PDF file. |
| Fractional Mometum Loss of (Anti)Proton Reconstrcuted from Calorimeters |
|
DPE:
XI_pbar(CAL)
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
DPE:
XI_p(CAL)
[EPS][GIF] |
SD:
XI_pbar(CAL)
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
SD:
XI_pbar(CAL)
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| BSC-1 vs MiniPlug Hit Multiplicities |
|
Antiproton
Side: RP+Jet5 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
Proton
Side: RP+Jet5 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
Antiproton
Side: Jet5 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
Proton
Side: Jet5 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Kinematic Distributions of DPE, SD and ND Dijets | |
| Mean
ET of Leading Two Jets [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
Mean
Pseudorapidity of Leading Two Jets [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
| Azimuthal
Angle Difference of Leading Two Jets [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
|
| CDF+H1 | CDF Run I FjjD from DPE/SD dijets (FCDF on one side, H1-fit2 on the other side) |
| CDF | CDF Run I FjjD from SD/ND dijets (FCDF on both sides) |
| H1-fit2 | H1 LO-fit2 to 1994 Large Rapidity Gap data (both sides) |
| H1-fit3 |
H1 NLO-fit3 to 1994 Large Rapidity Gap data (both sides) |
| ZEUS-LPS | ZEUS NLO-fit to 1997 LPS data (both sides) |
| ZEUS-Mx |
Groys, Levy, Proskuryakov (GLP) NLO-fit to 1998-99 ZEUS Mx data (both sides) |
| ET of Highest ET Jet |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| ET of Second Highest ET Jet |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Mean ET of Two Highest ET Jets |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Pseudorapidity of Highest ET Jet |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Pseudorapidity of Second Highest ET Jet |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Mean Pseudorapidity of Two Highest ET Jets |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Invariant Mass of Two Highest ET Jets |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Calorimeter Tower (ET>100MeV)
Multiplicity vs Tower Psudorapidity |
||
[EPS][GIF] ![]() |
| Calorimeter System Mass |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: H1-fit3 [EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: ZEUS-Mx
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Dijet Mass Fraction |
||
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
PDF: CDF
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
|
PDF: ZEUS-LPS
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
![]() |
|
| Dijet
Mass Fraction with 3rd Jet Veto Binned maximum likelihood fits of POMWIG+ExHuME(ExclDPE) to data |
|
| PDF: CDF+H1-fit2 Signal: ExHuME ET(jet1,2) > 10 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() ET(jet1,2) > 25 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
Signal: Exclusive DPE (DPEMC) ET(jet1,2) > 10 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() ET(jet1,2) > 25 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
| Pseudorapidity Cuts on Jet1 and Jet2 Region (A) = etajet1 < -0.5 or etajet2 < -0.5 Region (B) = etajet1 > -0.5 and etajet2 > -0.5 |
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
| Dijet Mass
Fraction with 3rd Jet Veto + Region (A) Binned maximum likelihood fits of POMWIG+ExHuME(ExclDPE) to data |
|
| PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
Signal: Exclusive DPE (DPEMC) ET(jet1,2) > 10 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
|
|
Fraction of
exclusive dijet signal in the DPE data in the kinematic range specified
below. The left (right) table gives the fractions obtained in the
combination of POMWIG and ExHuME (POMWIG and Exclusive DPE in DPEMC)
Monte Carlo simulations. The four different Pomeron PDFs are used in
the POMWIG. The errors in the tables are statistical only.
[PDF][JPG]![]() |
|
| Dijet Mass
Fraction with 3rd Jet Veto + Region (B) Normalizations of MCs are fixed to the ones obtained in fits for 3rd jet veto only MC distributions are scaled using actual #events falling in region (B) |
|
| PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
Signal: Exclusive DPE (DPEMC) ET(jet1,2) > 10 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
|
| Dijet Mass
Fraction with 3rd Jet Veto + Region (A) Normalizations of MCs are fixed to the ones obtained in fits for 3rd jet veto only MC distributions are scaled using actual #events falling in region (A) |
|
| PDF:
CDF+H1-fit2
Signal: Exclusive DPE (DPEMC) ET(jet1,2) > 10 GeV [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
|
| Exclusive Dijet Cross Section vs ET(min) Comparison with hadron level predictions of ExHuME (red) and Exclusive DPE in DPEMC (blue) |
|
|
Cross sections for
inclusive DPE dijet (2nd column) and exclusive dijet (3rd column)
productions for different minimum ET of leading two jets in the
kinematic range specified in the table. The 4th column gives the ratio
of exclusive to inclusive dijet cross sections. The first (second)
error in the table is statistical (systematic) uncertainty.
[PDF][JPG]![]() |
| Exclusive to Inclusive Dijet Cross Section Ratio vs ET(min) | |
| ExHuME Hadron-Level Differential Exclusive
Dijet Cross Section vs Dijet Mass - Default ExHuME prediction (red) - Derived from CDF Run II Preliminary exclusive dijet cross sections (points) --> Statistical (vertical bars) and systematic (yellow bands) errors are propagated from measured cross section uncertainties using ExHuME Mjj distribution shapes |
|
| We have
presented preliminary results on the search for exclusive dijet
production using double Pomeron exchange (DPE) dijet data (see above).
In the studies, we observe an excess of events in the data over
backgrounds obtained from inclusive Monte Carlo and the excess is
consistent with exclusive dijet Monte Carlo predictions in terms of
kinematic distribution shapes. In the analyis presented here, we
discuss an approach for extracting the exclusive dijet signal from the
inclusive DPE dijet sample using heavy flavor quark jets. Preliminary
results obtained from the data collected after the Fall 2004 shutdown
are presented. |
| Heavy
Flavor Fractions and Secondary
Vertex Mass |
|
| 3-components
(b, c, light flavor) fit [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
2-components
(b+c, light flavor) fit [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
| Ratio of b/c-Jet
to Inclusive Jet as a function of Rjj |
|
| All systematic
uncertainties are added in quadrature [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
Ratio is
normalized to
the mean value in Rjj<0.4 [EPS][GIF] ![]() |
| Comparing
Inclusive Jet and Heavy Flavor Jet Results F1 = HF/inclusive jet ratio (normalized) F2 = POMWIG/data ratio for inclusive jets --> 1 - F2 = (data-POMWIG)/data ratio = Exclusive Dijet Fraction |
[EPS][GIF]![]() |
[EPS][GIF]![]() |