HY Logo Observation of Exclusive Photon Pair Production in CDF CDF Logo




Abstract

We have observed exclusive photon pair production in proton-antiproton collisions at \sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV, using 1.11 +- 0.07 fb^{-1} of integrated luminosity taken by the Run II Collider Detector at Fermilab. We select events with two electromagnetic showers, each with transverse energy E_T > 2.5 GeV and pseudorapidity |\eta| < 1.0, with no other particles detected in -7.4 < \eta < +7.4. The two showers have similar E_T and have \Delta\phi ~ \pi; 34 have two tracks, consistent with the QED process p \bar{p} -> p + e^+e^- + \bar{p} by two-photon exchange, while 43 events have no charged tracks. From the distribution in the number of electromagnetic clusters in wire chambers at shower maximum (6 X_0) we conclude that < 16% (at 95% C.L.) of these events are exclusive \pi^0\pi^0. The contribution of events with p(\bar{p}) dissociation is negligible. The cross section of p\bar{p} -> p+\gamma\gamma+\bar{p} with |\eta(\gamma)| < 1.0 and E_T(\gamma) > 2.5 GeV is \sigma^{|\eta|<1, E_T>2.5 GeV}_{\gamma\gamma excl.}=2.48 +- 0.42(stat) +- 0.41(syst) pb. This agrees with predictions for the process \pom+\pom \rightarrow \gamma\gamma, where \pom is a pomeron, through an intermediate quark loop.

Public note



Selection of blessed plots




  • Trigger rate versus instantaneous luminosity. [eps|png]

  • Log10 (ADC counts of PMT with largest signal) in BSC-1 West. [eps|png]

  • Log10 (ADC counts of PMT with largest signal) in Miniplug West. [eps|png]

  • Log10 (ADC counts of PMT with largest signal) in Central EM cal. [eps|png]

  • Exclusive efficiency (= probability of no detected interaction) as a function of bunch luminosity (data taking period 9). [eps|png]

  • Invariant mass of exclusive e⁺e⁻ events compared to MC. [eps|png]

  • Azimuthal angle difference (from back to back) between the photons compared to MC. [eps|png]

  • Transverse momentum of photon pairs compared to MC. [eps|png]

  • Invariant mass of exclusive photon pair events compared to MC. [eps|png]

  • Number of CES strip chamber shower distribution (sum of both sides) for photon pair candidates compared to photon pair and neutral pion pair MC. [eps|png]

  • Chi2 value fit of data to background signal composition versus fraction of exclusive neutral pion pair background. [eps|png]


Eventdisplays

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the Durham theory group for useful discussions, especially to V.A. Khoze, M.G. Ryskin, W.J. Stirling and L.A. Harland-Lang. We thank the Fermilab staff and the technical staffs of the participating institutions for their vital contributions. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation; the Italian Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; the National Science Council of the Republic of China; the Swiss National Science Foundation; the A.P. Sloan Foundation; the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung, Germany; the Korean World Class University Program, the National Research Foundation of Korea; the Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Royal Society, UK; the Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS; the Russian Foundation for Basic Research; the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci\'{o}n, and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain; the Slovak R\&D Agency; the Academy of Finland; and the Australian Research Council (ARC).

General Remarks

  • The preliminary results were blessed in the QCD group on Friday the 19th of May 2011.
  • Please contact us if you have any questions about our results.


  •  Updated by Erik Brucken
    For questions regarding this website contact brucken@cc.helsinki.fi
    Last updated May 2011.