![]() |
Measurement of Particle Production and Inclusive Differential Cross Sections in pbar(p) Collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV |
|
Authors: Niccolo' Moggi, Manuel Mussini, Franco Rimondi University and I.N.F.N., Bologna |
|---|
The track pT differential cross section d3σ/pTdydΦdpT. This measure extends the spectrum range a factor 15 wider than the previous CDF measure in 1988. The differential cross-section now spans over 11 orders of magnitude. In the plot below is shown the total uncertainty: statistical (solid line) and systematic (yellow band). The new data shows how the function used in Run0 to fit the region [0.4 - 10] GeV becames inadequate at higher pT. The dotted line is the Run0 fit. The continuous green line is a fit to the present data in the same limited region. The same power-law function: f = A ( p0 / pT+p0 )n cannot be employed for a fit to the whole spectrum. Find numerical data here |
![]() [eps]
|
|
The convolution of all corrections applied is reflected in the overall variation of the raw to the corrected spectrum as shown here. |
![]() [ eps
]
|
|
Here is shown a comparison with Pythia MonteCarlo simulation at hadron level. Pythia was tuned with the so called tune-A with pT(hat)=1.5 GeV. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. |
![]() [ eps ]
|
|
Correlation of the average track pT with the event multiplicity (number of primary tracks). RunII measure is compared with RunI and gives no indication of structures at high multiplicities as may be expected in some non-perturbative production models. In this plot are used also events collected from a special "high-multiplicity" trigger which selects Minimum-Bias interactions with more that 23 tracks converging to the primary vertex and no other requirements. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown in the lower plot. Regardless all the improvements in the comprehension of low-pT production, the models are still unable to reproduce second order quantities such as final state particle correlations. When multiple parton interactions are suppressed (``no MPI'') an excessive increase of particle momenta is observed. Find numerical data here |
![]() ![]() |
|
MC with full calorimeter simulation is employed to evaluate the response of the central calorimeter to the event ΣET. The raw ΣET distribution undergoeas a number of corrections. The most important is shown above and requires that the corredted distribution is "unfolded" to correct for smearing among bins. The unfolding factor is computed with a sample of MC re-weighted to best reproduce the data distribution. |
[ eps ] [ eps ] |
|
The ΣET cross-section spectrum d3σ/dηdΦdET. The (transverse) energy is measured in the central region only as the sum of the ET of each calorimeter tower in |η|<1. This plot shows the fully corrected distribution. Statistical (solid line) and systematic uncertainties (yellow band) are shown below). Find numerical data here |
![]() [ eps ]
|
|
Same plot compared to Pythia simulation at hadron level. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. |
![]() [ eps ]
|
|
| The measure of the sum ET is very sensitive to multiple interactions. For this reason we selected only crossings with only one reconstructed primary vertex and limited the analysis to the very low-luminosity runs. Still, some undetected multiple interactions remain (mostly cases of overlapping vertices). We can evaluate their amount by studying how the average track multiplicity varies with the instantaneous luminosity. The effect of multiple interactions is then corrcted for. | ![]() [ eps ]
|
| send comments to moggi(at)bo.infn.it or rimondi(at)bo.infn.it |
|---|