CDF Logo A Brief Summary of QCD Results at CDF


The CDF QCD physics group studies QCD physics at the Fermilab Tevatron Proton-Antiproton Collider operating at a center-of-mass energy of 1.8 TeV. Below is a summary of the main activities and results from the QCD group.
High-Et Jets

The highest Et jets recorded by CDF are the result of interactions at distance scales of a few times 10^-17 cm, almost an order of magnitude smaller than the weak scale ! The inclusive jet cross-section has been measured from jet transverse energies of 15 GeV up to in excess of 400 GeV, a range over which the cross-section falls by 9 orders of magnitude ! Current NLO perturbative QCD predictions give an excellent description of this spectrum except that they slightly (but significantly) underestimate the observed rate in the region Et > 200 GeV. The origin of the discrepancy is not yet understood, but might indicate an inadequacy of the current QCD calculations (e.g. an inadequate gluon distribution function at high x) and this is under study. The spectrum of two-jet masses and the spectrum of total-Et (summed over all jet Ets in each event) also exhibit small deviations from the current QCD predictions at the highest masses and total-Et. The two-jet angular distribution is however consistent with the NLO QCD expectations, and has been used to place a limit on the scale of quark substructure, Lambda > 1.4 TeV. The detailed kinematic properties of multijet events (with up to 6 jets) at the highest multijet masses have also been shown to be fully consistent with QCD expectations.


Testing QCD Scaling Violations

Due to the evolution of alpha_s and the evolution of parton distributions, QCD predicts scaling violations; i.e. if the invariant jet cross-section is plotted as a function of the dimensionless variable xT = 2 Et / sqrt(s) then the result depends on sqrt(s). In the 1989 data run CDF collected data at sqrt(s) = 546 GeV, and compared the invariant jet cross-section at 546 GeV and 1800 GeV. Scaling violation was observed, but at low Xt the violations were at a level smaller than the NLO QCD predictions. CDF have therefore recently taken a much larger sample of low energy data, this time at sqrt(s) = 630 GeV. Preliminary results seem to confirm the sqrt(s) = 546 GeV observations, but the full systematics have not yet been evaluated.


W/Z + Jets

The W + n-jet and Z + n-jet cross sections and associated jet production properties have been measured for n=1 to 4. The data consist of 6708 Z -> e+e- decays and 50387 W -> e nu decays from 106 pb**-1 of integrated luminosity. About 20% of the W and Z events have associated jets with Et > 15 GeV. The jet rates and properties are well described by LO QCD predictions.


Direct Photon Production

The inclusive direct photon spectrum has been compared to NLO QCD predictions. A long-standing problem has been that the predictions do not give a good description of the shape of the observed spectrum. This has motivated improved calculations which have reduced but not eliminated the discrepancy. Recent developments suggest that if additional (parton shower) gluon radiation is added to the NLO QCD model then a good agreement is obtained. This presence of this additional gluon radiation also broadens the pT spectrum for diphotons, and this has been observed. The need for additional gluon radiation has broad implications outside of CDF for the analysis of lower energy direct photon data and extraction of parton distribution functions. The photon + jet rapidity distribution, and the photon + 1-jet and photon + 2-jet angular distributions have also been measured and compared with QCD predictions. The measured photon + 1-jet angular distribution, which is very sensitive to photon fragmentation effects, is observed to be steeper than the NLO QCD, perhaps indicating a larger fragmentation contribution than is presently in the calculation.


Jet Shapes and Fragmentation

In PRL 70, 713 (1993) CDF showed that the Et dependent shapes of jets (the amount of energy contained in a cone as a function of cone size) is qualitatively reproduced by NLO QCD calculations and by QCD parton shower Monte Carlo predictions. Quantitatively, the measured shapes lie between the NLO and the parton shower Monte Carlo predictions, and the conclusion is that the radiation of a single hard gluon in the final state accounts for much of the observed jet shape, although it is clearly not the full story. More recently, CDF has measured the Et dependent fragmentation function for charged tracks and compared with MLLA QCD predictions. There is very impressive agreement between the observed and predicted fragmentation functions. The QCD model has 2 parameters, which are the cutoff scale at which partons turn themselves into hadrons, and a normalization parameter which specifies how many charged particles each parton gives rise to. It is found that the cutoff scale is 230+/-20 MeV. The fragmentation fits agree with equivalent results from TASSO/OPAL/ALEPH, but the jet Et range probed is much larger than for the e+e- experiments. Finally, CDF has also used tracking to study subclusters within jets. Evidence for subclusters in high-Et jets is observed, and subcluster properties have been compared with HERWIG parton shower Monte Carlo predictions. In the Monte Carlo subclusters arise due to color preconfinement. In general HERWIG gives a good description of many of the subcluster properties, a more detailed analysis is in progress.


Heavy Flavor Production


Double Parton Scattering

The double parton scattering (DPS) cross-section was reported by CDF in PRD 47, 4857 (1993) for events in which both scatters result in two jets with Et > 25 GeV. About 5% of the data sample was observed to come from DPS. More recently CDF has observed DPS in the photon + 3-jet channel (one scatter -> two-jets, and the other -> photon + jet). In this data sample roughly 50% of the events come from DPS, enabling the detailed properties of DPS events to be studied. No evidence of significant correlations between the two scatters is observed.


Diffractive Results and Pomeron Studies


Last updated Sep 23, 1996
Suggestions ? Contact sgeer@fnald.fnal.gov