This are the results for 6 different benchmark parameters of the MSS
The following comments are  common to all the 6 plots  showed in this page:

"The  plot shows  the exclusion region in the search for charged Higgs in the (mH,tan(b)) plane.
The green region at the bottom is the latest LEP results (hep-ex/0107031) obtained by assuming H+ decaying to csbar or tau nu only.  The left and right blue-striped areas represent the ' Theoretically inaccessible' regions as reported by CPsuperH.
The red solid region represent the exclusion reion obtained in this analysis, considering the possible decay of the charged Higgs to csbar, taunu, t*B->WbB, and Wh0/WA0.
  
Finally, the black-striped bands near the boundary of the exclusion region, were obtained by throwing pseudoexperiments where the number of candidates were poisson-fluctuated around SM expectations. The band covers the mean plus/minus RMS of the limit distribution  obtained in the enssamble of PSE.
This gives both, an idea of where our limits are, and how they compare to the SM. If the red exlcusion region were to lie apart from the sensitivity band in an amount several times bigger than that set by the band, we would conclude that signal is present in the sample. "

Below each plot a description of the features of each benchmark is detailed. Also links to the plots in eps format  are provided.

Finally, a link to the plots without the sensitivity bands is also provided in gif and eps.
WARNING: It is my opinion (R.E.) NOT TO ENCOURAGE PLOTS WITHOUT THE SENSITIVITY BANDS  TO BE SHOWN PUBLICLY, but ultimately that is up to the speaker to decide.  And this is why.


Bench #1 Benchmark #1
Benchmark #1 :  This benchmark enhances the BR(t->Hb) at large tan(b) since its very low value of mu, while at tan(b) ~1, where the decay H+->Wh0 occurrs, the maximum stop mixing condition is achieved maximazing the value of the  h0 mass.
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)
Bench #2 Benchmark #2
Benchmark #2 :  This benchmark enhances the BR(t->Hb) at large tan(b) since its very low value of mu, while at tan(b) ~1, where the decay H+->Wh0 occurrs, the minimum top mixing condition is achieved minimazing the value of the  h0 mass.
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)
Bench #3 Benchmark #3
Benchmark #3 :  This benchmark suppresses the BR(t->Hb) at large tan(b) since its very high value of mu, while at tan(b) ~1, where the decay H+->Wh0 occurrs, the minimum top mixing condition is achieved minimazing the value of the  h0 mass.
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)
Bench #4 Benchmark #4
Benchmark #4 :  This benchmark suppresses the BR(t->Hb) at large tan(b) since its very high value of mu, while at tan(b) ~1, where the decay H+->Wh0 occurrs, the maximum stop mixing condition is achieved maximazing the value of the  h0 mass.
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)
Bench #5 Benchmark #5
Benchmark #5 :  This is the typical benchmark scenario developed for the search of h0 at LEP(hep-ph/9912223). The value of At is computed as a function of tan(b), allowing for the minimum mass of the h0 for each value of tan(b).
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)
Bench #6 Benchmark #6
Benchmark #6 :  This is the typical benchmark scenario developed for the search of h0 at LEP(hep-ph/9912223). The value of At is computed as a function of tan(b), allowing for the maximum mass of the h0 for each value of tan(b).
(eps file here)
(Plots without the sensitivity bands gif and eps)