Top Pair Production Cross Section with Loose SecVtx

A. Foland, M. Franklin, J. Guimaraes da Costa, S. Rappoccio, D. Sherman
Harvard/CDF

Results (318 pb-1) for mtop = 178 GeV/c2
Single Tag: 8.7+0.9-0.9 (stat) +1.2-0.9 (syst) pb
Double Tag: 10.1+1.6-1.4 (stat) +2.1-1.4 (syst) pb


Summary
We have measured the top pair production cross section in the lepton plus jets decay channel with 318 pb-1 of CDF data. We select events containing a 20-GeV electron or muon, 20 GeV of missing transverse energy, and at least three 15-GeV jets. We further require at least one jet to contain a decay vertex displaced from the origin. Vertices are found using a high-efficiency version of the SecVtx algorithm, which trades a 150% increase in light-flavor tags for a 20% increase in bottom jet tagging efficiency. We further reduce the backgrounds with tight cuts on the total transverse energy in the event and the transverse mass of the leptonic W. In events with at least one tag, we measure a cross section of 8.7+0.9-0.9 (stat) +1.2-0.9 (syst) pb, and we measure 10.1+1.6-1.4 (stat) +2.1-1.4 (syst) pb in double-tagged events, all assuming a top mass of 178 GeV/c2.




Read the paper

Email the authors

Links



Links to all blessed materials can be found below
Cross Section Values
Background Summary Plots/Tables
Kinematic Distributions
Miscellaneous


Cross Section Values

A summary of all measurements of the top cross section from this analysis follows. The "unoptimized" numbers correspond to the basic event selection, and the "optimized" measurements have additional requirements on the leptonic W transverse mass and the sum of the transverse energy in the event (Ht) to minimize the background. The "likelihood" value is the result of a simultaneous fit to the single-tag and double-tag cross section (for the optimized analysis). Finally, the "4-jet" result is derived from requiring 4 or more jets in the single-tag, unoptimized analysis. The first results shown (for the optimized analysis) should be considered the default measurements for this analysis.

Optimized Single Tag
8.7+0.9-0.9 (stat) +1.2-0.9 (syst) pb
8.7+0.9-0.9 (stat) +1.1-0.8 (syst) +0.5-0.5 (lum) pb

Optimized Double Tag
10.1+1.6-1.4 (stat) +2.1-1.4 (syst) pb
10.1+1.6-1.4 (stat) +2.0-1.3 (syst) +0.6-0.6 (lum) pb
Unoptimized Single Tag
8.6+1.0-0.9 (stat) +1.3-1.1 (syst) pb
8.6+1.0-0.9 (stat) +1.2-1.0 (syst) +0.5-0.5 (lum) pb

Unoptimized Double Tag
9.5+1.5-1.4 (stat) +2.1-1.5 (syst) pb
9.5+1.5-1.4 (stat) +2.0-1.4 (syst) +0.6-0.6 (lum) pb
Likelihood Fit Cross Check
8.7+0.9-0.9 (stat) +1.5-1.4 (syst) pb

4-Jet Single Tag Cross Check
9.5+1.1-1.1 (stat) +1.1-1.1 (syst) pb

Background Summary Plots/Tables

The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) number of jets in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the optimized analysis.
The expected and observed signal and background contributions for the single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) optimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) number of jets in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected and observed signal and background contributions for the single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) unoptimized analysis.

Kinematic Distributions

In the following plots, we attempt to compare kinematic distributions in data and Monte Carlo. The shapes for di-boson, single top, and W+Heavy Flavor backgrounds are taken directly from the simulation. The W+Light Flavor template is usually taken from the data, weighted by the event mistag probability; for vertex properties, the negative tag distributions are used (events with both a positive and negative tag are used for double-tag W+Light Flavor). The Non-W background shape is taken from data that fails only the lepton isolation cut. All plots sum the expectations from the 3, 4, and 5-jet bins (unless otherwise noted), and none of the optimization cuts have been applied. KS Probabilities estimate the agreement between data and Monte Carlo.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) Ht distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) Missing Et distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) W Transverse Mass distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) Z distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) jet Et distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) jet Eta distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) tagged jet Et distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) tagged jet Eta distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) vertex chi2 distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) ctau distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) L2d distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) L2d Significance distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) tag radius distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) tag mass distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) number of good tracks distribution in single-tagged (left) and double-tagged (right) events for the unoptimized analysis.
The expected (solid histogram) and observed (points) tag-tag mass (left) and untagged jet-jet mass (right) in double-tagged events. Jets are not fully corrected, and the plot on the right only includes the four-jet bin (with two untagged jets).

Miscellaneous


Summary of systematic uncertainties for the single/double optimized/unoptimized cross section measurement.



Comparison of event efficiencies for the tight and loose tagger analyses.



Properties of the loose tagger.



Comparison of acceptances and efficiencies for events with primary electrons and muons.



Correction to the mistag prediction as a function of the summed jet Et.



Dependence of the single-tag cross section on the Monte Carlo generated top mass.



Dependence of the double-tag cross section on the Monte Carlo generated top mass.



Theoretical mass dependence of the top cross section with our results assuming a top mass of 178 GeV.



Theoretical mass dependence of the top cross section with our results extrapolated to a top mass of 175 GeV.