1) JINR, Dubna
2) INFN and Department of Physics, University of Pisa
3) Fermilab, USA
We present the top quark mass measurement in the tight lepton and isolated track sample
using neutrino &Phi weighting method.
The unconstrained system of dilepton events is solved using
the hypothesis about neutrino phi values.
In 2.1 fb-1 of data, we measure the top mass Mtop=167.7 +4.2-4.0 (stat.) ± 3.1 (syst.) GeV/c2 from the 236 events passing the event selection.
Internal Web Page
Public Note
| Description of tables and plots | gif | eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-component, constrained fit to the Measured top mass from 236 data events: Mtop=167.7 +4.2-4.0 (stat.) ± 3.1 (syst.) GeV/c2 |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expected statistical errors from pseudo-experiments.The arrows indicate the errors returned by the fit to the data. |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The examples of the signal templates for masses in the region 159-189 GeV/c2. |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Templates of background processes Drell-Yan, Diboson, "fake" events. Lower right plot shows the combined background. |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The extracted top mass as a function of input mass. The result of a linear fit is also shown. The lower plot shows the residuals (reconstructed - input top mass). |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean (above) and &sigma (below) of pull distributions determined from the pseudo-experiments as a function of input top mass. |
| eps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Systematic errors. |
Systematic uncertainties
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We also performed the unconstrained fit to the |
| eps |
| Missing Et distribution for 2 jet events. |
![]() | eps |
|---|---|---|
| Pt lepton distribution for 2 jet events. |
![]() | eps |
| &Delta &Phi between missing Et and highest Et jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| Two lepton invariant mass distrubution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| Et leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta &Phi between Missing Et and second leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta &Phi between Missing Et and tight lepton distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta &Phi between Missing Et and isolated track distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta R between tight lepton and isolated track distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta R between tight lepton and leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta R between tight lepton and second leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta R between isolated track and leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| &Delta R between isolated track and second leading jet distribution for 2 jet events. |
| eps |
| Missing Et distribution for 0 jet events. |
| eps |
| Missing Et distribution for 1 jet events. |
| eps |
| Pt lepton distribution for 0 jet events. |
| eps |
| Pt lepton distribution for 1 jet events. |
| eps |
| Dilepton invariant mass distribution for 0 jet events. |
| eps |
| Dilepton invariant mass distribution for 1 jet events. |
| eps |
| Predicted vs observed number of events with different jet numbers. |
| eps |
by Vladimir Glagolev and Oleg Pukhov