Measurement of the Inclusive Forward-Backward
Asymmetry and its Rapidity Dependence Afb(|Δy|)
of tt Production in 5.3/fb of Tevatron Data

Glenn L Strycker, Dan Amidei, Andrew Eppig,
Dave Mietlicki, Alexei Varganov, Monica Tecchio
University of Michigan

Thomas A Schwarz, Robin Erbacher
University of California-Davis

Joey Huston
Michigan State University

Documentation
Public Note

Send an email to the authors



List of Important Links

Validation plots for this analysis

Public Note

Previous Analysis -- public page
Previous Analysis -- public note

PRL 101 202001 (arxiv hep-ex/0806.2472)
PRL 101 202001
CDF9169, Public Page
CDF9156, Public Page





Abstract


We measure the parton level forward-backward asymmetry of pair produced top quarks using 1260 semi-leptonic b-tagged tt events reconstructed with the chi^2 based kinematic fitter. This is an update to the measurements found in CDF-9705, PRL 101, 202001 (CDF-9295), CDF-9122, and CDF-9078. We have increased the dataset from 3.2/fb (data through period 19) up to 5.3/fb (data through period 27). We study the rapidity, y_top, of the top production angle with respect to the incoming parton momentum. In order to measure the production asymmetry in the tt frame, we also study the Lorentz-invariant quantity qΔy. We find the parton-level forward-backward asymmetry to be

Afb (ppbar) = 0.150 ± 0.050stat ± 0.024syst
Afb (ttbar) = 0.158 ± 0.072stat ± 0.017syst

consistent with the result of CDF-9705 and PRL 101 (202001).

These results should be compared with the small ppbar frame charge asymmetry expected in QCD at NLO, Afb = 0.050 ± 0.015. Additionally, we introduce a measurement of the Afb rapidity dependence Afb(|Δy|). We find this to be

Afbttbar(|Δy|<1.0) = 0.026 ± 0.104stat ± 0.055syst
Afbttbar(|Δy|>1.0) = 0.611 ± 0.210stat ± 0.141syst

which we compare with MCFM model predictions 0.039 ± 0.006 and 0.123 ± 0.018 for the inner and outer rapidities, respectively.


Please see our public note for a complete description of our method.
Below are the blessed plots, tables, and numbers for this analysis.





In QCD at LO, the top production angle is symmetric. In NLO a small charge asymmetry develops and appears, in the Tevatron system, as a forward-backward asymmetry of order A = 0.038 in the lab frame and A = 0.058 in the tt rest frame. More generally, unexpected new tt production channels could be revealed in a forward-backward asymmetry.

We study lepton+jets events in which the tt four-vectors are completely reconstructable using only mass constraints on the two top quarks and two W bosons in each event. The asymmetry is measured:

For each distribution, backgrounds are subtracted, and acceptance and smearing effects as parameterized by Pythia after radiation are deconvolved to yield distributions of these variables at the parton level.

We present calculations of the asymmetry at data, background subtracted, and parton level, as well as a derive the Delta y dependence of the asymmetry.






Table 1 -- Raw Asymmetry Numbers

  -q•yhadqΔy
  Forward EventsBackward EventsAfbForward EventsBackward EventsAfb
Raw 676 584 0.073 ± 0.028666 594 0.057 ± 0.028
BkgSub 542.0 434.7 0.110 ± 0.036525.1 451.6 0.075 ± 0.036
Corrected561.0 414.8 0.150 ± 0.05 570.3 414.5 0.158 ± 0.072
MCFM     0.038 ± 0.006     0.058 ± 0.009
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1

Asymmetries in the lab frame (-qy_had) and tt rest frame (Delta y_t)





Table 2 -- Numbers for Afb(|Δy|)

  Afb(|Δy|<1)Afb(|Δy|>1)
  Forward EventsBackward EventsAfbForward EventsBackward EventsAfb
Raw 518 497 0.021 ± 0.031148 97 0.208 ± 0.062
BkgSub 414.3390.80.029 ± 0.040110.760.90.291 ± 0.090
Corrected390.7371.10.026 ± 0.104179.743.40.611 ± 0.210
MCFM     0.039 ± 0.006     0.123 ± 0.018
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1

Asymmetry in tt rest frame at large and small |Delta y_t|





Table 3 -- Numbers for Many-binned Afb(|Δy|)

  |Δy| < 0.750.75 < |Δy| < 1.51.5 < |Δy| < 2.252.25 < |Δy|
Raw 0.020 ± 0.0350.117 ± 0.0520.184 ± 0.1400.600 ± 0.358
BkgSub0.030 ± 0.0430.151 ± 0.0070.330 ± 0.2700.858 ± 0.621
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1

Asymmetry in tt rest frame as a function of |Delta y_t| (no parton level values)





Reconstructed -qy_had, equivalent to y_top = -y_tbar in lab frame.





Reconstructed -qy_had separated by lepton charge.





Reconstructed –qy_had in four bins, with background subtraction and corrections to the parton level.





Reconstructed qdeltay, equivilent to y_top - y_tbar.





Reconstructed deltay separated by lepton charge.





Reconstructed qdeltay in four bins, with background subtraction and corrections to the parton level.




The next set of plots explore the Delta y dependence
of the asymmetry in the tt rest frame.





Reconstructed qdeltay in eight bins, for raw data and data-background.





The asymmetry as a function of Delta y, Afb(|deltay|), for raw and background subtracted data.





The asymmetry in the tt rest frame at small and large |Delta y|, including correction to the parton level and comparison with the MCFM prediction.




The next two plots show the distribution of production angles in the lab
and tt rest frame. These contain the same information as the respective rapidities.





The Afb value for cos(theta) in the lab frame matches the raw Afb measured for qy_had.





The Afb value for cos(theta*) in the tt rest frame matches the raw Afb measured for qdeltay.




These last plots show our background shapes and
validation for our background estimation method.





Here are the predicted background shapes (and corresponding Afb values) for the background components of qy_had.





Here are the predicted background shapes (and corresponding Afb values) for the background components of qdeltay.





This plot of antitagged events shows that the background+signal shape for qy_had is good.





This plot of antitagged events shows that the background+signal shape for qdeltay is good.






Table 4 -- Systematic Uncertainties for Data-Background

Systematic Uncertaintyq•yhadqΔyAfb(|Δy|<1)Afb(|Δy|>1)
Background size0.0120.0060.0030.030
Background shape0.0110.0040.0030.015
Total Uncertainty0.0160.0070.0040.033
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1





Table 5 -- Systematic Uncertainties for Corrected Distributions

Systematic Uncertaintyq•yhadqΔyAfb(|Δy|<1)Afb(|Δy|>1)
Background size0.0150.0110.0020.086
Background shape0.0140.0070.0050.107
ISR/FSR0.0100.0010.0040.004
JES0.0030.0070.0020.003
PDF0.0050.0050.0540.013
Color Reconnection0.0010.0040.0070.007
MC Generator0.0050.0050.0040.033
Total Uncertainty0.0240.0170.0550.141
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1





Table 6 -- Table of Inclusive Results

  q•yhadqΔy
Data (Raw) 0.073 ± 0.028 0.057 ± 0.028
Data-Background0.110 ± 0.036 ± 0.0160.075 ± 0.036 ± 0.007
Corrected 0.150 ± 0.050 ± 0.0240.158 ± 0.072 ± 0.017
MCFM Prediction0.038 ± 0.006 0.058 ± 0.009
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1





Table 7 -- Table of Rapidity Dependence Results

  all qΔyAfb(|Δy|<1)Afb(|Δy|>1)
Data (Raw) 0.057 ± 0.028 0.021 ± 0.031 0.208 ± 0.062
Data-Background0.075 ± 0.036 ± 0.0070.029 ± 0.040 ± 0.0040.291 ± 0.090 ± 0.033
Corrected 0.158 ± 0.072 ± 0.0170.026 ± 0.104 ± 0.0550.611 ± 0.210 ± 0.141
MCFM Prediction0.058 ± 0.009 0.039 ± 0.006 0.123 ± 0.018
CDF II Preliminary -- L = 5.3 fb^-1





by Glenn Strycker

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional Valid CSS!