Tape Technology for Run II
D. Amidei
Jan 2000
There is a Committee to consider this:
"The Serial Media Working Group"
D. Amidei, M. Diesburg co-chairs
J. Bakken, D. Benjamin, B. Blumenfeld,
K. Chadwick, G. Cooper, S. Fuess, K. Genser,
S. Lammel, L. Lueking, J. Patrick, D. Petravick,
D. Schamberger, H. Schellman, R. Thies, A.Walters
Where we left off:
SONY Advanced Intelligent Tape: AIT-1 25GB 3MB/s AIT-2 50GB 6MB/s shipping "now"
$3500/drive,
$100/tape AIT-3 100GB 12MB/s "2001" EXABYTE Mammoth M-1 20GB 3MB/s M-2 60GB 12MB/s shipping "now"
$4,500/drive,
$80/tape M-3 120GB 18MB/s "2001"
SMWG Activities
1/19/99 Quantun DLT Site visit
1/20/99 Writeups of previous round of tests of DLT, Mammoth-1, AIT-1.
(S. Lammel,
CDF-4856, 4857, 4858)
2/17/99 Begin new program of tape drive tests with Mammoth-1,
AIT-1, and DLT on
ADIC robot. K. Genser supervising.
2/23/99 Exabyte Site visit (DA,SL,MD,KG)
3/5/99 List of performance and reliability questions sent to
Exabyte (re Mammoth-2)
and Sony (re AIT-2)
3/12/99 Exabyte team @ FNAL, inc Jorgen Frandsen, Dir. Eng.
3/31/99 Receive replies to questions from Exabyte
4/21/99 Exabyte transmits Mammoth-2 product schedule ("General availability 9/28/99")
5/5/99 Report from EMASS test program
Reappraisal of Ampex option
(L. Lueking, see end)
Sense of committee: Mammoth
"best", but keep options open
5/11/99 Initiate P.O. for 3 AIT-2.
Media limit! 2 50G tape/drive8/25/99 Rumor: Sony fails to improve 50G AIT-2 media yields
8/29/99 Second Exabyte Site Visit Mammoth-2 Test Drives
Fall 99 Many iterations with buggy Mammoth-2 microcode
1/5/00 Exabyte Ships First "Customer" Mammoth-2's
1/23/00 R/W full Mammoth-2 tape at FNAL
EXTENSIVE TESTING of AIT-1, M-1 (and DLT)
S. Lammel, Fall 98:
Bench tests, repeated R/W passes, load/unload
Summarized in CDF4856, 4857, 4868.
K. Genser, Spring 99:
Repeated operations in ADIC robot
Mount/skip/read/backspace/write/rewind/dismount, etc
Summarized in report to SMWG
Somewhat repeatable results:
DLTs eventually have the tape stuck in
the drive
AITs develop hard and soft R/W errors
after large
number
of passes (12,000 in one case)
Drive is "dirty", but cleaning
light never came on
Conclusions
Performance of both AIT and Mammoth far better than
8mm
experience in Run I. In the Spring test, one of each drive still
OK after ~20,000 mounts, compare to average lifetime of 450
passes with Exabyte 8500.
OTHER KINDS OF INFORMATION
Re Media
Both AIT and Mammoth use Metal Evaporated Tape
For the 50/60G tapes (230m)
Sony has 1 supplier
Exabyte has 4 suppliers
è
Nerves about AIT-2 media availabilityRe Exabyte:
Extremely good interactions with company
Re Sony:
Very difficult to get a straight story from anyone
Believe we were lied to about irregularities in AIT-1 media
May 99 "SENSE OF THE COMMITTEE"
Mammoth-1 has performed acceptably in our tests, and Mammoth-2 looks promising. Mammoth-1 is back compatible with Run I tapes, and would be an acceptable starting point, with forward compatibility of new tapes to Mammoth-2.The Committee feels that Exabyte Mammoth is the best candidate at this time.However, we still have a window this summer for testing both Mammoth-2 and AIT-2, and we will.We would like to make a decision that would allow us to have of order 10 drives installed for each experiment by ca. September
THEN WHAT:
5/11/99 Initiate P.O. for 3 AIT-2.
Media limit! 2 50G tapes/drive8/25/99 Rumor: A focussed program at Sony fails to improve 50G AIT-2 media yields
8/29/99 Second Exabyte Site Visit Mammoth-2 Test Drives
i.e. general availability is delayed
Fall 99 Many iterations with buggy Mammoth-2 microcode
AIT-2 running at FNAL. Looks OK but n.b. no stress tests.
Comdex 99: Super DLT and LTO, expected Q4-99, are delayed
1/5/00 Exabyte Ships First "Customer" Mammoth-2's
1/12/00 Meet with ADIC representative. Learn that their 8mm install
base is > 15,000 AIT, almost no Mammoth
1/20/00 Rumor: Sony is adding a second supplier for AIT-2 tapes
Will "eliminate backlog" by April
1/23/00 R/W full Mammoth-2 tape at FNAL
WE COULD:
Fear
: Exabyte is too late with M-2, will not recapture
market, will fold, we will be stuck with data archived
with defunct technology
Fear:
No tapes to be found as TBytes begin to flow from B0WE NEED TO:
Re-evaluation of a Data Center Option
L. Lueking, May 99
Table I. Drive streaming throughput, media and AML2 capacities.
Mammoth II numbers assume 230m tapes.
Ampex Mammoth I Mammoth II
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drive 20 3 12
(MBps)
Media 279 18 60
capacity (GB)AML2 1152 5185 5185towerslotsAML2tower 321 93 311capacity
(TB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table II. Quantity, unit price, and total costs for drives to support
200 MBps (streaming) and media to store 1 PB of data.
Mammoth II numbers assume 230m tapes.
AMPEX Mammoth I Mammoth II
Number @ Total Number @ Total Number @ Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drive 10 100k 1,000k 70 2.5k 175k 20 4k 80k
Media 3584 250 896k 55,555 80 4.45M 16,666 80
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $1,896k $4,625k $1,413